This story, from the Jan. 12, 2017, edition of the New York Times, was little-remarked upon at the time, but suddenly has taken on far greater significance in light of current events:

In its final days, the Obama administration has expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.

The new rules significantly relax longstanding limits on what the N.S.A. may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations, which are largely unregulated by American wiretapping laws. These include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches.

The change means that far more officials will be searching through raw data. Essentially, the government is reducing the risk that the N.S.A. will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.

One of the central questions behind the Mike Flynn flap that should have been asked but largely wasn’t is: who was wiretapping the general? The answer, we know now, was the National Security Agency, formerly known as No Such Agency, the nation’s foremost signals-intelligence (SIGINT) collection department.

Good Read…

See Also:

A George Soros-Led Mutiny

ObamaCare in ‘death spiral,’ Aetna CEO says

Humana to Drop Out of Obamacare Exchanges in 2018

MSM fake news feeding frenzy to take down Trump

Piers Morgan: Media Effort to ‘Delegitimize, Sabotage and Destroy’ Trump ‘Un-American’

O’Reilly: Media Talking ‘Trash’ About Trump, Speculation About Flynn Resignation ‘Garbage’

Bridge Construction Group: Nearly 56,000 Bridges Nationwide Deemed ‘Structurally Deficient’

Greenwald: The Democratic Party ‘Has Collapsed as a National Political Force’

Poll: Majority of Hispanics Support Deporting Criminal Illegal Aliens, Plurality Back Defunding of Sanctuary Cities

(Visited 2 times, 1 visits today)