Congressional Democrats, including Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, are calling on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to resign following reports that he was in touch with Russia’s ambassador twice during last year’s presidential campaign. Pointing to Sessions’s failure to disclose these contacts during his recent confirmation hearings, House minority leader Nancy Pelosi, among others, is accusing him of lying under oath.

The available facts suggest otherwise. According to the Justice Department, the former Alabama senator met briefly with a group of ambassadors following his address at an event sponsored by the Heritage Foundation in July, amid the Republican National Convention. In a press conference on Thursday afternoon, Sessions acknowledged also meeting with Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak privately last September. Sessions maintains that he met Kislyak in his capacity as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and that some of his senior aides were present. Meetings between senators and diplomatic officials are, of course, common: Missouri senator Clare McCaskill, who attacked Sessions on Twitter for the sit-down, has in the past publicized multiple visits of her own with the Russian ambassador.

During his confirmation hearings, Sessions was grilled by Minnesota senator Al Franken. Citing recent reports that “there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government,” Franken asked Sessions: “If there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?” Sessions responded: “I’m not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I’m unable to comment on it.” In a follow-up questionnaire, Vermont senator Patrick Leahy asked, “Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?” Sessions answered: “No.”

It’s clear now that Sessions’s response to Franken was inaccurate, and the whole episode could have been avoided had Sessions been clearer up front. But the context makes it fairly clear that Sessions was denying coordination with the Russians about the presidential election. There is no indication that Sessions willfully misled the Congress; based on what we know so far, Democrats’ perjury accusations are fantasy.

More…

See Also:

The Perjury Allegation against Jeff Sessions Is Meritless

7 Reasons the Jeff Sessions Witch Hunt Is Ridiculous

White House: Sessions Met Russians as Senator, Not Trump Surrogate

Paul Ryan: ‘No Evidence’ of Sessions Colluding with Russia During Election

Phony outrage at Sessions from alt-left media who ignored Lynch, Obama conflicts

Mark Levin to Congress: Investigate Obama’s ‘Silent Coup’ vs. Trump

Former U.S. Attorney Claims FBI Has Names of CIA Leakers

Senate Confirms Dr. Ben Carson 58-41 to Lead Housing and Urban Development Department

AFL-CIO Signals Support for Trump’s Legal Immigration Overhaul

Trump weighs military action against North Korea over nuclear program

It’s Trump’s Party, Now

Soros-Tied Obama Lawyers Form Group to Battle Trump

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)